Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ 5,372 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Memory 8.09 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 74.7 20% 40.4 Pts	4-Core 76.5 8-Core 76.4 10% 76.4 Pts	64-Core 75.6 5% 75.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA721075KLA 750GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 688GB free (System drive) Firmware: GK8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 9.8 10 10 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 79.4 Write 9.8 Mixed 14.6 SusWrite 10.1 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 46%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 2GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.2 7.3 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 5.8 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 7.2 10% 8.98 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 2048, 2048, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 422 10% 422 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 4450eAMDBench 35%, 511 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	2x
Phenom X3 8550AMDBench 41%, 347 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x
GeForce 9500 GSNvidiaBench 2%, 1,408 samples	2x