Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 258
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 603
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 39.2
32% 40 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 27.8
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 358 382 385 387 390 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 409
Write 378
Mixed 348
SusWrite 368
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 37.2
134% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 191
148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 20.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback