Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 16:05
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 520
57% 453 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 53.6
34% 45.3 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 40.3
39% 49 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 99 103 102 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 88.4
Write 80.2
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 97.6
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 82%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 124 124 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 122
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback