MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 20:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 204
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 336
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(1642 3E32) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.79
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.4
11% 17.1 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 15.5
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 512GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 693 721 596 328 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,494
Write 745
Mixed 317
SusWrite 538
170% 773 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 50.7
136% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 459
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 606
419% 517 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 158%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.8% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback