Intel S5520HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory124GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 124GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S5520HC  (all builds)
Memory120.6 GB free of 124 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 19:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 166
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 494
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 6.7
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 152 125 33 125 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 160
Write 89
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 99.7
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 8.8
34% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 8.6
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 10.9
8% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
574GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 146 146 146 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 120
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 145
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 124GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 4096, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5520HC Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel S5520HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback