Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 16:55
Run Duration1192 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 253
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 779
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2983 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 165
Parallax 167
122% 161 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 142
Splatting 101
94% 117 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
92GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 510
Write 352
Mixed 361
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 19
88% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 36.4
43% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 126%
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB
49GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 251
Write 149
Mixed 173
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.9
46% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 24.4
30% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36%
Great: 41%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 516
Write 350
Mixed 369
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 20.3
90% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 49.1
55% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74%
Great: 110%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
111GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 138
Write 113
Mixed 94.5
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.57
152% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72%
Great: 80%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
253GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 43
Mixed 10.7
38% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EURX-64WRWY0 4TB
86GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 40.4
Mixed 39.1
52% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.26
96% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 42%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
77GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 42.9
Mixed 24.4
45% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 61%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-22YGA0 500GB
18GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.4% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 0.9
Mixed 1.45
6% 7.16 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.13
20% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 30.4
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 29.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback