Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 187
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 349
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 18
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.8
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 179 161 138 152 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 246
Write 185
Mixed 202
SusWrite 150
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 19.7
82% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 39.1
37% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
533GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 168 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 122
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 166
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
675GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 152 152 155 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 138
Write 98.8
Mixed 69
SusWrite 152
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
6GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.3 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 3.7
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
73% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback