Today's hottest deals

Trigem DREAMSYS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemTrigem DREAMSYS  (all builds)
MotherboardPCPartner MILANO-P
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 342
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1379) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 44.6
Parallax 40.4
34% 42.2 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 34.9
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$99
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 207 206 208 202 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 235
Write 208
Mixed 200
SusWrite 199
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 33.2
118% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 177
132% 175 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HCS721050CLA362 500GB
171GB free
Firmware: JP2OA52B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 129 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 66
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
276GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 75
Write 76.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 104
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DREAMSYS Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Trigem DREAMSYS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback