ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '21 at 06:34
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 772 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 148 58% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 636 54% 467 Pts	64-Core 2,484 154% 2,484 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Lighting 92.2 Reflection 90.5 Parallax 83.7 75% 88.8 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 81.2 Splatting 72.3 71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB 2,574 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 233 227 229 229 231 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 374 Write 358 Mixed 316 SusWrite 232 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 32.9 102% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 247 206% 300 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 106%
SK hynix SC313 HFS512G32TNF-N3A0A 512GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 211GB free Firmware: 0P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 27 27 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 116%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 267% 913GB free Firmware: EXA71HAQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 349 343 359 359 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 2053 Write 1,938 Mixed 1,372 SusWrite 370 320% 1,433 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 52.8 169% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 470 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 532 366% 453 MB/s
Poor: 184% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 321%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 260 Write 41.3 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 33.6 71% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2 609% 4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CK0 8x16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8 of 12 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 64.8 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 36.8 132% 46.1 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.1 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	154x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $365	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback