Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 15:11
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 778
84% 670 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 144
Parallax 143
115% 142 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 121
Splatting 110
100% 125 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,581
Write 2,276
Mixed 1,867
498% 2,241 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 87
290% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1,045
780% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%
PHINOCOM 256GB
194GB free
Firmware: P0810A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 458 458 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 456
Mixed 390
SusWrite 458
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 42.5
149% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 222
184% 263 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 204 205 203 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 156
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 203
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 119%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback