Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
MotherboardDFI CST51
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 14:47
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 109
49% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 283
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 102
Parallax 6.8
5% 38.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD420I 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1225CH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 385 407 423 401 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 419
Mixed 331
SusWrite 394
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 38.5
129% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 200
174% 256 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 99%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23.9
16% 23.9 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSH64V6B-I 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback