Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3420M APU 4,510 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 51 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 70.4 33% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 126 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G 8,067 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C624) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 2.6 2% 3.27 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 149 149 155 154 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 219 Write 154 Mixed 155 SusWrite 150 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 13.4 43% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 57.8 54% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.3% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
UD PRO 256GBGigabyte $49Bench 84%, 2,163 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 479 samples	5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	3x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38