Acer Aspire V5-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V5-571G
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime17 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2377M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 63.3
44% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 98.7
8-Core 99.3
13% 99 Pts
64-Core 99.8
6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 072B) 1.8GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.4
0% 1.03 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA920
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 47 41 46 49 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 75.4
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 41.1
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF1339J.M8F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-571G Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback