Today's hottest deals

Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory34.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, , , 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 12:49
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 86
2-Core 170
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 670
59% 503 Pts
64-Core 2,357
146% 2,357 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 32.1
19% 27.5 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 24.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,133
Write 1,974
Mixed 1,458
413% 1,855 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 69.4
232% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 590
436% 578 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
399GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 28 26 25 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
384GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 136 136 135 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 102
Mixed 78
SusWrite 135
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB 40GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.7% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback