Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-E  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 14:21
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 120
52% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 191
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7
Asus(1043 85CB) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 9.5
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.7
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 80GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 49 53 44 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 87.5
Write 79.8
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 43.5
16% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 8.3
28% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 7.6
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 8.5
6% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 23%
Virtual Disk 1.5TB
106GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 50 53 44 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.8% Very poor
Read 72
Write 71.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 44.5
14% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 6.3
22% 7.17 MB/s
DQ Read 7.1
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 7.6
6% 7.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 16.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback