QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.1 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 36.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 174
56% 105 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 269
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 877E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 88.4
Parallax 91.7
74% 90.2 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 71
70% 88 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,621
Write 3,883
Mixed 4,136
801% 3,546 MB/s
4K Read 458
4K Write 447
4K Mixed 393
1,434% 433 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 228
190% 270 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Qemu HARDDISK 500GB
141GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,617
Write 2,869
Mixed 3,817
767% 3,434 MB/s
4K Read 460
4K Write 411
4K Mixed 356
1,371% 409 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 255
212% 300 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20.9
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback