Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20EQS00J00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20EQS00J00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS00J00
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 12:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 563
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 73.4%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4285
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.7
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.66%
 Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.25
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.7
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 16.2
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 16.8%
 Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 193 91 101 111 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 329
Write 345
Mixed 319
SusWrite 146
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 21.2
66% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 12.4
78% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 54.6%
 Great: 95%
Toshib THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
374GB free
Firmware: JYLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 338 244 343 340 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 323
Write 348
Mixed 314
SusWrite 305
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 24.4
85% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 22
93% 210 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 71.4%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 72.7%
 Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback