Today's hottest deals

Samsung R508

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 98% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung R508  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R508
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 58%
CPU Throttled 98%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T1700
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 39.6
29% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 40.1
8-Core 40.7
5% 40.4 Pts
64-Core 40.2
2% 40.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Sanyo(144D C042) 780MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 0.2
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS54321 160GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C4CC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 29 15 19 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 42
Write 43.3
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 23.7
22% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R508 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Samsung R508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback