Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20FD002VFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FD002VFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FD002VFR
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 08:52
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 94.5
50% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 188
23% 177 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2237) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7812
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3.8
0% 1.93 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.2
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TN8U256G1001 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 176 131 137 140 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 368
Write 227
Mixed 192
SusWrite 156
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 21.9
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 215
174% 249 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 90%
SAMSUNG MZ7TD256HAFV-000 256GB
220GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 29 32 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 36.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 34.5
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 8.7
689% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 10.3
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 10.9
885% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 396%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-2G3AZ 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Chip DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback