MSI MS-16F2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT680R/GX680R/GT683R/GT683DXR/GT685R/GT687R/GX660DXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16F2  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120406
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 09:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2960XM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 86.5
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 150
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 35.5
8-Core 61.6
6% 48.5 Pts
64-Core 53
3% 53 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
MSI(1462 10A2) 1GB
CLim: 708 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8
Parallax 5.7
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.9
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 226 231 247 220 228 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 410
Write 252
Mixed 231
SusWrite 228
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 19.5
74% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 118
100% 152 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
256GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 49 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 80
Write 70.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 48.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 830B M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16F2 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16F2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback