Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-R3  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130426
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1620-$49
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1620 @ 2.70GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 72
2-Core 138
60% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 137
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 3GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 37 33 27 31 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 14.9
Write 14.9
Mixed 16
SusWrite 33.4
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2P-R3 Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback