HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 12:00
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 226
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 492
56% 437 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 5.53
4% 6.07 fps
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 0.04
2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+447G 480GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 143 148 150 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
USB30 250GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.7 8.5 8.7 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.1% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 41.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 8.7
7% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 12.9
42% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 67%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
38GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.7 8.4 8.7 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 40.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 8.6
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
47GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.7 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 39.3
Mixed 33
SusWrite 8.6
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
191% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 79%
ST1000DL 002-9TT153 1TB
223GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 8.3 8.5 8.5 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 37
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 8.4
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 23%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
33GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 33 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 34.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 36.1
42% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18%
Great: 45%
ST310003 40AS 1TB
243GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.2 8.5 8.5 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Read 35
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 8.4
15% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.7
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback