Today's hottest deals

HP 510-p109

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 510-p109  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 822A
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 133
48% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 226
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 36.2
23% 32 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 36
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 167 206 146 171 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 465
Write 415
Mixed 368
SusWrite 168
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 8
76% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 128
124% 198 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 191 199 199 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 175
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 196
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 113%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
2TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 112 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 126
Write 113
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 114
139% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.8
221% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 19.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 510-p109 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 510-p109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback