Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 456
60% 453 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.00.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 78.5
54% 70.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 53.7
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 105 122 125 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 127
Write 132
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 112
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback