Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 06:04
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 797
77% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 86.5
Parallax 82.1
78% 88.1 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 75.2
61% 74.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM1T9HAJM-000MV 2TB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM00M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 443 447 441 434 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 461
Mixed 418
SusWrite 436
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 44.4
150% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Crucial MTFDDAK960TDS 960GB
419GB free
Firmware: D3MS000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 463 476 481 479 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 321
Write 483
Mixed 329
SusWrite 470
91% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 39.4
151% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 312
234% 309 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Crucial MTFDDAV240TCB 240GB
217GB free
Firmware: D0DE008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 246 251 253 252 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 253
Mixed 221
SusWrite 250
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 35.6
150% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 214
177% 255 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 31.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 29.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback