HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 10:49
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 186
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 519
59% 462 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 14.3
15% 15.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 20.1
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 496 369 343 345 315 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
USB3.0 60GB
39GB free
Firmware: 8105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 334
Write 75
Mixed 119
SusWrite 66.9
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 18.7
65% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 70.3
DQ Write 54
DQ Mixed 55.2
43% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
480GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 168 168 168 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 112
Mixed 75
SusWrite 167
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback