Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 20:08
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 105
50% 79 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 300
30% 245 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 49.7
33% 40 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 35.9
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 75 64 83 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 36.8
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 66.3
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL11 Series 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback