Acer Aspire XC-605G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605G
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 02:27
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 419
57% 423 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 0750) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 103 115 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 151
Mixed 78
SusWrite 116
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 112%
MIBAO-M2 00 34GB
31GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.8 5.3 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.85% Terrible
Read 15
Write 5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.9
8% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 5%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.2 1.7 2.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 2.5
96% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 140 140 141 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 187
Write 178
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 139
192% 147 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.6
309% 4.07 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
331% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 89%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA100V 1TB
843GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 141 140 141 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.7% Above average
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 139
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback