Today's hottest deals

Asus K52JT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K52JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52JT
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 14:31
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 88.2
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 80.3
51% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 213
23% 183 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.91
1% 1.93 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 52 65 65 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 62.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 56.5
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-115.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.1
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback