Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 186
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 498
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
MSI(1462 37B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 148
Parallax 149
128% 151 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 131
Splatting 104
113% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 254 248 255 215 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66% Good
Read 451
Write 252
Mixed 243
SusWrite 242
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 22.6
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 130
111% 169 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
248GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 417 428 409 417 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 450
Mixed 384
SusWrite 418
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 43
139% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$162
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 153 152 153 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 102%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 142 143 133 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 107
Write 134
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 139
158% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 31.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback