Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEmaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A70FM2+iCafe
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 10:47
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 130
50% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 205
29% 212 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Lighting 8.87
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 6.28
7% 8.16 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 9.83
Splatting 10.6
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 215
Mixed 272
70% 319 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 30.2
103% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 111
89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
408GB free
Firmware: KC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 67.5
Mixed 64.8
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
WD Elements 1TB
261GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85
Write 23.7
Mixed 48.8
58% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 99U5584-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A70FM2+iCafe Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback