Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 188
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 364
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 74.2
0% 45.6 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 3.07
Splatting 0.39
1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD120 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 64 42 34 38 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 497
Write 425
Mixed 396
SusWrite 99.8
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 25.1
113% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 38.8
84% 166 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 92%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
421GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 87 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 87.5
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 88.5
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB4GU2400.C8FT Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 25.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback