Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 07 '17 at 07:47
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 412
55% 411 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2836) 2GB
CLim: 1426 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.1% Average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 59.2
40% 51.2 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 42.8
43% 54.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,783
Write 1,260
Mixed 1,408
329% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 28.9
90% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 176
141% 187 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 185%
Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 171
Mixed 160
125% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.22
100% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 74.4
Write 73.2
Mixed 74
56% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 45%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
187GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 67
Mixed 66
50% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%
ORICO NS1066 80GB
43GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 52.5
Mixed 44.9
64% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.42
61% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2788, 2788 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback