Asus X750JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus X750JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X750JA
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '17 at 20:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 96
2-Core 194
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 331
48% 349 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4600 (PHDGD Skylake v2.9)
Asus(1043 122D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 3.0.64.2016
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 7.56
4% 6.51 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.83
6% 7.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 366
Mixed 385
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 33
123% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 117
139% 241 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
548GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 96.3
Mixed 95.6
72% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.37
98% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X750JA Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback