Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 03 '17 at 06:58
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 369
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2835) 2GB
CLim: 1391 MHz, MLim: 1787 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.2% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 57.7
41% 50.7 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 41.7
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,941
Write 923
Mixed 1,188
297% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 30.1
173% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.9
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 30.3
43% 75.3 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 189%
Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 173
Mixed 162
128% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.22
97% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 75.3
Write 75.3
Mixed 71.4
56% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 45%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
291GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 73.3
Write 73.9
Mixed 70
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.27
87% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2521, 2521 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback