Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20ERS00900

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20ERS00900 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20ERS00900
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 187 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 546 54% 440 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Legend(17AA 222F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.3% Poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 31.5 14% 27 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 45.3 33% 39.6 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000 256GB 448 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 131 77 85 96 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 375 Write 76.8 Mixed 152 SusWrite 98.1 38% 175 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 10.3 30% 9.27 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 167 129% 179 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 106GB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 126 126 129 127 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 142 Write 117 Mixed 69 SusWrite 122 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB 4,427 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback