Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 01 '17 at 16:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 287
36% 277 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2835) 2GB
CLim: 1391 MHz, MLim: 1787 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40% Average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 56.2
40% 49.3 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 55.3
Splatting 40.7
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,874
Write 1,089
Mixed 1,264
311% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 30.7
171% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 30.3
40% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 196%
Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 174
Mixed 162
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.23
102% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44% Average
Read 75.3
Write 78
Mixed 72
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
291GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 72.6
Write 72.1
Mixed 71
54% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.33
97% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2521, 2521 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback