Asus X750JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus X750JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X750JA
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 16:39
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 92.1
1-Core 99
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 75.9
8-Core 322
21% 199 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4600 (PHDGD Skylake v2.9)
Asus(1043 122D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 3.0.64.2016
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 7.16
4% 6.09 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.09
6% 6.76 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 425
Write 374
Mixed 382
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 31.9
132% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 19.5
27% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
549GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 96.4
Mixed 95.3
71% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.34
96% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X750JA Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback