Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '17 at 15:30
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 132
56% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.2% Good
Lighting 82
Reflection 82.2
Parallax 79.6
67% 81.2 fps
MRender 79.8
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 65.8
59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 483
Write 467
Mixed 473
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 22.5
102% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 99.3
112% 191 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 385
Mixed 407
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 36.7
133% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 75.9
90% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 124%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00D8PB0 1TB
931GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 30.2
Mixed 31.9
41% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
655GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 29.7
Mixed 30.4
40% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.24
76% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback