Today's hottest deals

Asus X202E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X202E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X202E
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 20:48
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 71.6
31% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 120
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 108D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 2.34
2% 2.84 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 5.96
3% 3.72 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 119 125 127 116 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 430
Write 124
Mixed 122
SusWrite 115
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 15.1
66% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 45.8
70% 137 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X202E Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X202E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback