Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 15:04
Run Duration370 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 67.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
89% 170 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 991
95% 783 Pts
64-Core 1486
92% 1486 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 129
Reflection 138
Parallax 117
105% 128 fps
Gravity 125
Splatting 99.6
98% 112 fps
Poor: 86% Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 332 336 332 333 332 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,218
Write 1,560
Mixed 1,290
SusWrite 366
301% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 83.6
282% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 993
712% 916 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 238%
Great: 249%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
167GB free
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1920 1881 1697 1688 1712 1690 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
468% Outstanding
Read 2,305
Write 1,958
Mixed 2109
SusWrite 1,765
458% 2,034 MB/s
4K Read 226
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 205
708% 208 MB/s
DQ Read 1,295
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1,050
799% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 468%
Great: 559%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
82GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 272 273 273 273 273 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 448
Mixed 407
SusWrite 286
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 52
176% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 156
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 118%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
223GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 369 323 322 325 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 444
Mixed 369
SusWrite 350
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 54.9
180% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 95.7
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 94.9
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 122 122 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 121
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 178 176 159 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 146
Mixed 104
SusWrite 172
192% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 96%
ST2000DX 001-1CM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 174 177 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 186
Write 174
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 175
204% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.5
251% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.9
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 27.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $912
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback