Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '20 at 22:47
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 66.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
89% 170 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1001
97% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,493
92% 1,493 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 129
Reflection 136
Parallax 117
105% 127 fps
Gravity 125
Splatting 105
100% 115 fps
Poor: 86% Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 335 333 330 326 328 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,138
Write 1,537
Mixed 1,227
SusWrite 364
292% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83.1
276% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 996
713% 917 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 233%
Great: 249%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
167GB free
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1692 1669 1674 1675 1699 1682 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
459% Outstanding
Read 2,267
Write 1,912
Mixed 2087
SusWrite 1,682
447% 1,987 MB/s
4K Read 222
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 204
699% 206 MB/s
DQ Read 1,296
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 1,059
805% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 459%
Great: 559%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
82GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 272 271 272 271 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 481
Write 278
Mixed 202
SusWrite 272
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 30.8
134% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 69.1
87% 155 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 118%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
223GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 339 260 270 285 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 450
Mixed 332
SusWrite 314
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 54.9
182% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 94 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 96.7
Mixed 70
SusWrite 94.3
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 120
Write 90.2
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 52
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 179 176 159 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 146
Mixed 102
SusWrite 172
192% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 96%
ST2000DX 001-1CM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 175 175 175 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 187
Write 173
Mixed 84
SusWrite 175
205% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.5
251% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $911
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback