MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 193
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 586
53% 447 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 99
Parallax 108
85% 104 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 102
Splatting 64.8
80% 103 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056R6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 118 37 61 47 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 427
Write 413
Mixed 347
SusWrite 87.3
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 32.9
114% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 163
155% 243 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
390GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 157 155 156 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 180
Mixed 90
SusWrite 159
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 110%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB
14GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.5 2.4 6.3 2.4 2.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 3.9
10% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.8
135% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 16%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 135 137 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 124
Mixed 111
SusWrite 134
166% 118 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
189% 3.33 MB/s
SDHC Card 16GB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 15 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 10.3
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 16.7
19% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 24%
WD My Book 1110 499GB
455GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 34
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 34.8
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G F4-2400C15-4GVR KHX2400C15D4/4G F4-2400C15-4GVR 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 20.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 16.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $682
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback