MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 455
60% 453 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 19.8
12% 17 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 18.9
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 136 136 225 140 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 281
Write 90.4
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 166
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 13
55% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 16.7
13% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
824GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 197 199 201 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 168
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 199
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-2666Mhz-8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 37.1
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 29.8
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 108%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback