Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 954
84% 716 Pts
64-Core 2,621
162% 2,621 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3517 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 169
Parallax 171
133% 168 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 156
Splatting 113
121% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 31
20% 26.7 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 248 30 269 149 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 848
Write 910
Mixed 589
SusWrite 273
147% 655 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 21.3
78% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 2.2
111% 250 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 448%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,649
Write 1,083
Mixed 1,199
359% 1644 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 80.3
268% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 296
352% 614 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Amd-raid ST32000542AS 2TB
991GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 52 69 46 58 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 88.7
Write 84.4
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 61.6
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
261GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 91.5
Write 92
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 63.1
92% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
177% Outstanding
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 80.2
MC Mixed 62.6
202% 70.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 26.7
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 177%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $945
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback