Apple MacBookPro13,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro13,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A5C67F76ED83108C
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 15:04
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 59.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 182
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 502
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 450
Apple(106B 0167) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 18.1
12% 17.9 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 23
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256L 251GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS6AA0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 34 39 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 3,362
Write 29.5
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 34.6
182% 873 MB/s
4K Read 418
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.6
640% 142 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 306%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 19.6
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro13,3 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro13,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback