Today's hottest deals

Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock J3455M
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 34.6
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 31.7
19% 27.4 Pts
4-Core 75.3
8-Core 172
14% 123 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.56
1% 1.74 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 0.13
1% 1.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 154 153 182 151 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 391
Write 330
Mixed 335
SusWrite 166
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 11.6
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 12.6
24% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $616
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $371WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback