PC CHIMERA XT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPC CHIMERA XT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450-PLUS
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 18:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,046
98% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,428
88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 127
Parallax 107
102% 120 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s28 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,965
Write 1,058
Mixed 198
233% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 54.1
151% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 466
382% 529 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 198 201 208 207 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 184
Mixed 68
SusWrite 203
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K4 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K4 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.6
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 37.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CHIMERA XT Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: PC CHIMERA XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback