Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 17 WB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 17 WB  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200430
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 05:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 57
2-Core 114
50% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 413
38% 319 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 86B4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 7.25
4% 28.9 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 13.8
8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1432 1059 802 808 809 809 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,101
Write 1,485
Mixed 1,246
SusWrite 953
271% 1,196 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 53.4
173% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 432
315% 412 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 174%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2666HSB-16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 17 WB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 17 WB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback