Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 07:39
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$106
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 212
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 643
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B89) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 30.2
19% 23.7 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 23.8
17% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$35
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 431 434 436 435 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,198
Write 1,179
Mixed 1,012
SusWrite 464
216% 963 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 63.1
215% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 709
563% 784 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 180%
Great: 193%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
460GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 480 481 488 450 365 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 485
Mixed 451
SusWrite 455
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 59.8
198% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
205GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 984 970 1033 676 980 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,344
Write 481
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 932
211% 947 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 78.9
263% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 491
434% 656 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 225%
Great: 271%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
661GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 87.1
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 62%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
306GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.4
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 4.3
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 42%
ST316081 3AS 160GB
140GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 31.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 34.4
43% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
WD My Passport Essential 500GB
209GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 35 36 35 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 34.5
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback